I'll mention other low-cost and no-cost ways to run Windows apps on an Intel Mac, but VirtualBox may be the one that best fits your needs. But unless you need the fast performance and easy setup that the commercial products offer, and if you're willing to put up with multiple annoyances before Windows runs the way you want it, VirtualBox can get the job done. No-cost methods aren't always the best ones, and commercial products like Parallels Desktop ($79.99) and VMware Fusion (also $79.99) do a faster and better job than VirtualBox of emulating Windows on a Mac. VirtualBox isn't the best way to run Windows apps-or a complete Windows system-on an Intel Mac, but it's the only method that costs nothing, uses open-source software, and is reasonably simple to set up. Less powerful graphics than the competition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |